tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36253648342501645032024-02-20T08:38:32.563-08:00Stock Photo market and Creative Digital Photography guideStock Photo tips and Photography guide.
Digital Camera, lens and gear info.Dariushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09713031061124068675noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3625364834250164503.post-87209842776706446402007-04-01T10:02:00.000-07:002014-05-15T10:03:32.157-07:00 iStock buys Dreamstime microstockThere has been a lot of speculation about Getty Images buying everything that moves in the stock photo business. <b>The deal with Jupiter</b> is off, and some are suggesting Getty might be heading for a hostile offer on Corbis.<br />
<br />
I can´t see the headlines <b>"Getty buys Corbis"</b>
for 2 reasons: competition regulation might come into play, and Corbis
has too much financial clout and prestige in the backdrops. So what is
left for Getty Images to buy after the iStock acquisition?<br />
<br />
Well, the next stock photo headline will be <b>"iStockphoto buys Dreamstime Images"</b> or something similar. Get ready for the Microstock market consolidation.<br />
<br />
Nost
Microstocks have identical images, since all microstock is RF and most
submitters are not into exclusive rights, so what would be the point?<br />
<div>
<br />
<br />
<li>Killig the competition</li>
<li>There are some exclusives at each agency, meaning quality portfolio additions.</li>
<li>Editors at each agency sometimes pass different images, the mismatch grows the portfolio.</li>
<li>Aggregation of clients allows for price extensions and better profit.<br /><br />iStock
is the most respected Micro player and together with Shutterstock the
most profitable fo the photographers. If the cash and guts are there, it
would be easy for iStock to become superbly big. Dreamstime and Fotolia
are the only real competitors and gobbling them up would open for a
whole new scenario where iStock is the only player.<br /><br />I am not counting in Shutterstock since it is a 100% subscription service.<br /><br />So, did you think this was an April fools thing? Think again.</li>
</div>
Dariushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09713031061124068675noreply@blogger.com13tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3625364834250164503.post-34357607581978972982007-03-26T10:05:00.000-07:002014-05-15T10:05:30.809-07:00 polar bears threatened by climate threadGlobal Warming is hot. There is not much apart from sex that is a hotter
topic and sells more news these days. Unfortunately, global warming is
probably not a joke and something that we are just beginning to see the
effects of.<br /><br /><em>Disclaimer - this post is a offtopic rant. My blog - my right. Comprende?</em><br /><br />As
always, there are the yay! and the nay! sayers on this issue of climate
change, but.. and this is a big booty blubber rubbing butt sounding
but.. the nay! sayers seem to have in common a heartfelt conviction that
the notion of human intervention is a conspiracy for some reason or
other.<br /><br />In my view, many of the nay! sayers are like ostrich with
their heads in the sand, clinging to false information because it feels
good, and desperately hoping the storm blows by unnoticed... <br /><br />Each
to his own, but while ignorance may be bliss, self-indoctrination is
pure stupidity. I am not suprised that the loudest cries come from the
main perpetrators... If you have a hard time swallowing that you
probably belong to that group.<br /><br />My advice is , try to get out
more, smell the air, travel the planet a bit and check out other regions
than your local community... <br /><br />If you all are wondering, this rant is the product of "<a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1000&message=22587062">the polar bear climate change photo</a>"
thread at dpreview that started as a discussion about photography
rights and quickly bloomed into a more ecology focused heated exchange
;)<br /><br />As you might have guessed by now - I for one think we are
affecting the climate and i also think many a nagging feeling this might
be the case, which is probably a bit scary, and like stubborn kids in
the face of truth they try to shrug it off with a petualant "no!".<br /><br /><em>As I said, my blog - my right. Venting time galore.</em><br /><br />For
those that comment on forums and claim scientific evidence denying the
effects of 9 billion humans on the planetary ecology and biosphere...
Grow up. Try to be objective, educate yourself.. then comment. Citing a
couple of papers funded by the lobby groups is not very convincing. It
sort of has the opposite effect, get it?<br /><br />Let´s use the brain for a
second. Which group has most to loose by change.. the
industry/financial lobby community, or the scientific/climate lobby
community? Which group is more apt to receive government support in view
of political stability? Perhaps the group that advocates status quo?
Which audience is most easily manipulated? Very probably those who live
in ignorance with their head in the sand.. and later when the shit hits
the fan go "uh.. what the..? how? why? who?" .. who? how? why? c´mon,
think..<br /><br />Lets make a small test out of this. 6 questions. If you
get 3 or more answers right (approximate is acceptable) I will consider
you educated and someone to take seriously on this topic. If you only
know the answer to 2 or less you will deemed ignorant, uneducated,
indoctrinated and in need of a tuneup -- on this issue. A flunk and a
flake.<br /><br />A) How much airplane fuel does it take to fill a jumbo jet?<br />B) Why does northern Europe risk ice-age climate if global warming constinues?<br />c) Does more or less sunlight reach plankton today compared to 20 years ago?<br />E) Why are plankton important to humans?<br />F) How many people in USA would be affected if global sealevels rise 2 inches?<br />G) By how many fossil fuel cars there be India and China by the year 2010?<br /><br />Here is a bonus.. get this one right and you are superbly enlightened...<br />What is the main cause of global dimming?<br /><br /><br /><br />The original dpreview thread has some enjoyable sources of quotable material like:<br /><br />"In
fact, 800 years ago the earth was considerably warmer than it is today.
And there were no SUVs to blame for it back then...." dude, please
update your knowledgebase asap.<br /><br />"Man's CO2 output probably has
some impact on climate, but that impact is below the threshold of
natural variability. We can't detect our own signature, it's background
noise."<br /><br />"What a pathetic joke this all is. And to think of all
the time and money wasted on "global warming" while their are children
in the world starving to death." Um.. well, i hope you will be taking on
some of the refugees that may be coming your way during the next
decade.<br /><br />"You have to be a complete fool to see a picture of some
polar bears playing on some ice and think they're there because the
north pole melted and they're dying. Are the people who attend Al Gore's
lectures really so ignorant?" This is a good one.. you are the only one
seeing ghosts in the closet. Probably nobody on the whole planet
thought the specific bears in the images were in danger, or that the
bears as a species will die tomorrow. - it is called symbolism. doh<br /><br />"Most
of the warming occurred prior to the post-WWII ramp up in CO2 output.
Post WWI saw a sustained cooling period despite dramatic increases in
CO2 output." No comment, apart from suggesting further studies on
influence and effects by the original poster.<br /><br />"In fact all of
them completely denied that global warming was occuring until they saw
the movie "An Inconvenient Truth." Please get out of your provincial
box a little bit more and try not to push historic "facts" on others
based on your own limited experiences.. The globe is a bit bigger than
your own neighborhood.<br /><br />"The real danger is Al Gore, have you seen
how freaking big that guy is getting? At the rate he's growing I fear
he will eventually block out the sun!" haha, finally someone with a
sense of humor :)<br /><br />"The Kyoto Protocol calls for mandatory CO2
reductions (of 30%), which, in Dr. Fred Singer’s opinion, would have an
undetectable effect on global warming, but have a devastating effect on
the U.S. economy." The fact that the original poster is posting this in a
context of we must protect our status quo says it all.<br /><br /><strong>This one is my favorite:<br />"Human activity can contribute to no more than 0.117% of the greenhouse effect.<br />Do you understand that?"<br /><br />As proof Gary points to the following source of information<br /><a href="http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/HOMEPAGE5a.html">http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/HOMEPAGE5a.html</a></strong> :))<br /><br />Anyway,
enough of the rant. If you are wondering what to shoot on stock basis..
for the mid to long term perspective, environmental images, both
negative and positive will surely be in demand.Dariushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09713031061124068675noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3625364834250164503.post-17834480876378954552007-03-08T10:06:00.000-08:002014-05-15T10:09:06.436-07:00 Sigma DP1 specs and images<a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_MkRiN-pNVXI/Re_cqwJL1SI/AAAAAAAAAHc/ljhwYvOrO6I/s1600-h/sigmadp1.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5039489135086916898" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_MkRiN-pNVXI/Re_cqwJL1SI/AAAAAAAAAHc/ljhwYvOrO6I/s320/sigmadp1.jpg" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px;" /></a>The exclusive <b>Sigma DP1 wide angle compact</b> is finally here. The Sigma DP-1 is a fixed lens rangefinder compact with a quality lens equivalent to 28 mm in 35 mm terms.<br />
<br />
The
Sigma DP-1 is probably the most awaited compact ever, among the
enthusiast / pro community and the expectations on this camera are very
high. It is one of the few compacts to have a 28 mm angle and a quality
fixed lens. Even if the lens is F4 we should expect sharp results wide
open.<br />
<br />
Sigma DP1 images illustrate a good-looking camera measuring 113 millimeters wide and 240 grams with a 2.5 inch screen.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_MkRiN-pNVXI/Re_cxgJL1TI/AAAAAAAAAHk/N-giqQLHrNk/s1600-h/sigmadp1back.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5039489251051033906" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_MkRiN-pNVXI/Re_cxgJL1TI/AAAAAAAAAHk/N-giqQLHrNk/s400/sigmadp1back.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center;" /></a><br />
If
the image quality is good - then this is a Canon G7 killer. It the same
sleek body as the canon but lacks the zoom lens and IS. But.. and these
are important points for many: it has a 28 mm lens, and it shoots RAW
files.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_MkRiN-pNVXI/Re_fRwJL1UI/AAAAAAAAAHs/wg1YqK5TqQY/s1600-h/dp1sensor.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5039492004125070658" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_MkRiN-pNVXI/Re_fRwJL1UI/AAAAAAAAAHs/wg1YqK5TqQY/s320/dp1sensor.jpg" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px;" /></a>The
most interesting part of the Sigma DP1 is the Foevon X3 sensor that is
between 12 and 7 times bigger in area than other compacts on the market.
This is the same sensor you will find in the Sigma SD-14.<br />
<br />
The
Foevon sensor which is a CMOS captures light on 3 different substrates
and lacks the normal bayer mask that traditional CCD and cmos sensors
do. The upside on this is image quality and color fidelity. The downside
is cost and file size.<br />
<br />
The Sigma DP1 captures images at
2652x1768x3 layers. File size becomes equivalent to 14 megapixels. You
will need very large memory cards for this camera.<br />
<br />
You can
expect very very good noise performance in this DP1 compact. It also has
the same True Image processing that the sd-14 dslr has.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_MkRiN-pNVXI/Re_gZwJL1VI/AAAAAAAAAH0/CZS7dc0wW28/s1600-h/viewfinder.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5039493241075651922" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_MkRiN-pNVXI/Re_gZwJL1VI/AAAAAAAAAH0/CZS7dc0wW28/s320/viewfinder.jpg" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px;" /></a>The body has the black zen finish we are accustomed to from Sigma lenses.<br />
<br />
The
Sigma DP-1 also has integrated pop-up flash and a hotshoe for esternal
flash and the external viewfinder (á la leica). Check out the square
lens-hood. Pop it on and you it will look like a leica. Will it take as
good images as the Leica M8? Time will tell, but it has the potential to
be a superb performer.<br />
<br />
Sigma DP1 specification highlights<br />
<div>
<br />
<li>28 mm lens</li>
<li>Largest sensor area of any compact</li>
<li>Foevon sensor</li>
<li>Raw file format</li>
<li>9 focus point, can select single</li>
<li>Full manual controls</li>
<li>Shutter speeds 1/4000sec. to 15sec.</li>
<li>8 white balance modes incl. custom setting</li>
<li>Built-in flash + hotshoe</li>
</div>
Dariushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09713031061124068675noreply@blogger.com0